Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Android Gains in Smartphone Market

Thursday, July 8th, 2010

AndroidGoogle’s plan for world domination continues to gain momentum.  Particularly in the smartphone market, Comscore has the latest SmartPhone market share numbers for May:

RIM (Blackberry) 41.7%
Apple 24.4%
Microsoft 13.2%
Google 13.0%
Palm 4.8%

Google gained from last month while everyone else dropped off a bit.  They may have been helped a bit by some freezing of  the market that occurred as Apple rolled out the iPhone 4.  So things may even out a bit more between Apple and Google in the next few months, but I think it’s clear that Google’s open approach with its Android operating system is paying dividends.

iPhones on Verizon at Long Last

Wednesday, June 30th, 2010

According to Bloomberg, our long wait for the iPhone on Verizon’s wireless network may be over next January. I have been anticipating this for some time since I am a dedicated Verizon loyalist and absolutely refuse to switch to AT&T (I’ve seen my wife pulling her hair out with AT&T long enough while I have enjoyed nearly flawless service with Verizon).

The question now becomes whether I should opt for an Android phone now or wait another six months for the iPhone. Apple’s blocking of Flash applications and it’s restrictive licensing terms that prevent developers from using cross compilers are both bad news for the mobile phone consumer. These actions undoubtedly restrict the quality and depth of the user experience. Placing manacles on Apple developers by forcing them to write in Objective C, C, C++, or JavaScript flies in the face of common sense and can only hobble future development for the platform.

The other issue for me is the high cost of data plans with Verizon. $30 a month adds up to $360 a year for a capability that I honestly wouldn’t use that often. For 95% of my waking hours I am not more than ten feet away from a fully featured desktop or laptop computer (at home, the laptop is on the dinner table and we have two desktops upstairs).  Why would I choose to check my email with a small handheld that has a dinky screen and no keyboard as opposed to a desktop or laptop computer?  Obviously, I wouldn’t.

For the remaining 5% of time I’m either driving or engaging in some sort of social activity where it would be rude to become fully absorbed in playing games on my handheld. Of course, I’m not a member of the Facebook-generation where being online 100% of the time is one of life’s essentials.

So we will see. Maybe Verizon will wise up and offer folks like me a cheaper data plan at some point.

H.264 Codec Sees Rapid Rate of Adoption

Monday, May 17th, 2010

H.264 is a video codec that is part of the MPEG-4 standard and is one of two codecs that have become widely used with the HTML5 video element (the other being Ogg Theora). Apple has embraced H.264 for the iPhone and iPad as it has steered away from the use of Adobe Flash video codecs.

H.264 provides excellent video quality using much smaller video files than other technologies. Apple prefers H.264 because it helps to reduce the bandwidth requirements for users watching videos on their iPhone. It also means longer battery life and less storage required. And, best of all, it’s NOT from Adobe.

It appears that Apple’s efforts in popularizing H.264 are paying off according to the Meefedia Blog:

  • 26% of all web video is now available for playback in HTML5 using the H.264 format
  • Most sites that support HTML5 will detect iPad users and switch to an HTML5-compatible format

26% is a sizable increase from 10% at the beginning of 2010. If you’re Apple you’re undoubtedly happy with that adoption rate.

Adobe Flash does support H.264 but you cannot view those videos from a browser or device that does not have Flash installed.

Twitter in the age of ADD

Monday, March 29th, 2010

Joel Sposky has an interesting take on Twitter:

Although I appreciate that many people find Twitter to be valuable, I find it a truly awful way to exchange thoughts and ideas. It creates a mentally stunted world in which the most complicated thought you can think is one sentence long. It’s a cacophony of people shouting their thoughts into the abyss without listening to what anyone else is saying. Logging on gives you a page full of little hand grenades: impossible-to-understand, context-free sentences that take five minutes of research to unravel and which then turn out to be stupid, irrelevant, or pertaining to the television series Battlestar Galactica. I would write an essay describing why Twitter gives me a headache and makes me fear for the future of humanity, but it doesn’t deserve more than 140 characters of explanation, and I’ve already spent 820.

I have to admit that after a year of playing around with Twitter I tend to agree with Joel. I find the interface less than compelling and the content even less so. It’s like watching television where everything is a 15-second soundbite. Personally, when I browse the web I’m looking for something a bit more substantial. Twitter is clearly aimed at a younger generation afflicted with attention deficit disorder. You have to wonder how many avid Twitter-aholics have ever sat down and read an entire book.

A Vital Online Application

Monday, March 15th, 2010

Click here to see what I think of the San Diego Padres. This message was created using BigAssMessage.com.  This site should find a permanent home on your bookmarks bar for sure.

Smartphone Market Share

Monday, March 15th, 2010

Comscore has the latest SmartPhone market share numbers:

RIM (Blackberry) 43.0%
Apple 25.1%
Microsoft 15.7%
Google 7.1%
Palm 5.7%

Google shows the biggest gain over the previous quarter with a 4.3% increase while Microsoft lost 4%. So the good news all belongs to Google which has made significant headway in the smartphone market with its Android operating system.

Microsoft continues to struggle and is betting the farm on its launch of Windows Mobile 7. One major problem for Microsoft is that Mobile 7 cannot run apps built for older versions of Windows Mobile. This is because Microsoft essentially rewrote the platform from the ground up.

Application availability is one of Apple’s strongest selling points. For fifth-place Palm it is one of their weakest.

Expect Google Android to continue its march forward. The interesting question will be whether they can slow Apple’s momentum among new adopters.

Buzzkill on the Social Networking Highway

Wednesday, February 17th, 2010

By now you’ve probably heard about the furor around the launch of Buzz, Google’s answer to Facebook and Twitter. Buzz basically leverages your Gmail contacts to launch you into their own social network. The problem with Buzz is that Gmail users weren’t given a choice whether to opt out of Buzz and they suddenly found all of their most frequent email contacts exposed to the outside world.

If, for example, you were using Gmail to correspond with both your wife and an ex-girlfriend this could obviously create some dicey problems for you. There could be a wide variety of situations where you might not want certain friends to know that you’re corresponding with certain other people. Google, apparently oblivious to the privacy concerns that would be raised, plunged forward with their ambitious launch and have been struggling with damage control ever since. Privacy advocates have been understandably howling in rage.

Personally, I haven’t found social networking via Facebook and Twitter to be all that compelling. I can see how kids would love it as a way to keep in touch with friends, but as an adult I am not all that eager to be constantly sharing personal information with a large group of people. And sometimes I don’t really care to get the same sort of gory details that others are sharing about their lives. Consequently, I fairly quickly figured out how to drop out of Buzz which I saw as yet another social network I’m not truly crazy about.

All of this has caused me to question the wisdom of placing so much of my personal information in Google’s hands to begin with. I have been an avid user of Google Docs for sometime. What guarantees do I have that Google won’t dream up some kind of social document tool that would suddenly expose the contents of my documents to the outside world? It may sound far-fetched but is it really?

Yahoo! Everything

Sunday, December 6th, 2009

How exactly does it make sense that this Yahoo! Everything page is not in alphabetical order?

yahoo

Google Chrome OS

Monday, November 30th, 2009

By now you’ve probably heard that Google plans to introduce its own full-blown operating system called Google Chrome OS.  This initiative is a shot across the bow of Microsoft and Apple, and represents a sea change in how we think about operating systems.

Most of today’s most popular operating systems, like Windows and the Mac OS, began their lifetimes before the age of the Internet.  These are monolithic, top heavy conglomerations of software that have become increasingly complex over the years as more and more features are packed into them.  They consume large amounts of resources (disk space, CPU) and have (at least in Microsoft’s case) become a nightmare in terms of security.

Chrome OS represents a clean break with the past for operating systems.  It has been designed from the ground up with the idea that the Internet, not the desktop, is where computing will take place in the future.  Chrome OS is essentially a windowing system built on top of a Linux kernel.  There are no facilities for storing and manipulating files and data on your local computer.  Keeping with Google’s web-oriented roots, Chrome OS stores everything in the cloud.  It’s sort of like a web browser on steriods.  It will be able to boot up on its own in just a few seconds without the aid of any other software and put you immediately on the Internet.  The user interface will look virtually the same as the Chrome browser.  Your applications will run in tabs inside the browser.  The most likely target platforms for Chrome OS will be netbook-type computers that are likely to become increasingly popular next year, but Google also says that Chrome OS will eventually be available for desktops.

For a large subset of today’s computer users a fully web-based desktop operating system may be a good alternative to Windows or Mac OS.  These users will be freed from the hassle of configuring their computers, updating their software, managing anti-virus and anti-spyware applications, and organizing and backing up their documents.  For a lot of people taking this approach will mean little or no “feature loss”.

Here’s a screenshot from a netbook running Chrome OS:

chromeos

You can see a full demo here.  I am personally looking forward to purchasing a netbook running Chrome OS so I can have it sitting on my coffee table in the living room at an arm’s reach.  This will save me from climbing the stairs and having to boot up my clunky Windows XP machine.

Google Product Search

Tuesday, November 24th, 2009

goog2Google has a product search feature in beta now.  This may be useful with the holidays coming up.  I did a search for the Beatles “Love” CD and noticed quite a wide disparity in prices from $12 to $22.50.

The gallery view makes it easy to compare. You can click through the “Reviews” links to see what (hopefully) real people say about the product you are considering. They also have information about local stores where you can buy the product you have searched on.  It looks like Bing has developed some nice product search capabilities as well.