Archive for the ‘Handheld Devices’ Category

Consumer Reports Trashes the iPhone 4

Monday, July 12th, 2010

Consumer Reports says they cannot recommend the iPhone 4 due to its widely advertised antenna problem. They advise using a piece of duct tape to correct the issue. This isn’t the sort of publicity that Apple would prefer at this point in time I am sure especially with Android’s rising popularity.

Can’t see Flash on your iPhone?

Thursday, July 8th, 2010

If you think there’s no way you can see a Flash app on your iPhone you may not have heard of CloudBrowse.  CloudBrowse is a cloud-based browser and online service that provides a full desktop browser for the iPhone and iPod Touch.  The way it works is that you install their iPhone app which connects to a datacenter that hosts desktop machines running a standard browser.  You browse the web remotely through those machines and the app streams the content back to your iPhone.

Viola!  Now, you can get around Steve Jobs and check out any Flash-enabled web site using your iPhone.

The service is free for now.  They will likely charge for a premium version of the service in the future.  From their FAQ list is sounds like they’ve had some performance problems in the past.

Android Gains in Smartphone Market

Thursday, July 8th, 2010

AndroidGoogle’s plan for world domination continues to gain momentum.  Particularly in the smartphone market, Comscore has the latest SmartPhone market share numbers for May:

RIM (Blackberry) 41.7%
Apple 24.4%
Microsoft 13.2%
Google 13.0%
Palm 4.8%

Google gained from last month while everyone else dropped off a bit.  They may have been helped a bit by some freezing of  the market that occurred as Apple rolled out the iPhone 4.  So things may even out a bit more between Apple and Google in the next few months, but I think it’s clear that Google’s open approach with its Android operating system is paying dividends.

iPhones on Verizon at Long Last

Wednesday, June 30th, 2010

According to Bloomberg, our long wait for the iPhone on Verizon’s wireless network may be over next January. I have been anticipating this for some time since I am a dedicated Verizon loyalist and absolutely refuse to switch to AT&T (I’ve seen my wife pulling her hair out with AT&T long enough while I have enjoyed nearly flawless service with Verizon).

The question now becomes whether I should opt for an Android phone now or wait another six months for the iPhone. Apple’s blocking of Flash applications and it’s restrictive licensing terms that prevent developers from using cross compilers are both bad news for the mobile phone consumer. These actions undoubtedly restrict the quality and depth of the user experience. Placing manacles on Apple developers by forcing them to write in Objective C, C, C++, or JavaScript flies in the face of common sense and can only hobble future development for the platform.

The other issue for me is the high cost of data plans with Verizon. $30 a month adds up to $360 a year for a capability that I honestly wouldn’t use that often. For 95% of my waking hours I am not more than ten feet away from a fully featured desktop or laptop computer (at home, the laptop is on the dinner table and we have two desktops upstairs).  Why would I choose to check my email with a small handheld that has a dinky screen and no keyboard as opposed to a desktop or laptop computer?  Obviously, I wouldn’t.

For the remaining 5% of time I’m either driving or engaging in some sort of social activity where it would be rude to become fully absorbed in playing games on my handheld. Of course, I’m not a member of the Facebook-generation where being online 100% of the time is one of life’s essentials.

So we will see. Maybe Verizon will wise up and offer folks like me a cheaper data plan at some point.

H.264 Codec Sees Rapid Rate of Adoption

Monday, May 17th, 2010

H.264 is a video codec that is part of the MPEG-4 standard and is one of two codecs that have become widely used with the HTML5 video element (the other being Ogg Theora). Apple has embraced H.264 for the iPhone and iPad as it has steered away from the use of Adobe Flash video codecs.

H.264 provides excellent video quality using much smaller video files than other technologies. Apple prefers H.264 because it helps to reduce the bandwidth requirements for users watching videos on their iPhone. It also means longer battery life and less storage required. And, best of all, it’s NOT from Adobe.

It appears that Apple’s efforts in popularizing H.264 are paying off according to the Meefedia Blog:

  • 26% of all web video is now available for playback in HTML5 using the H.264 format
  • Most sites that support HTML5 will detect iPad users and switch to an HTML5-compatible format

26% is a sizable increase from 10% at the beginning of 2010. If you’re Apple you’re undoubtedly happy with that adoption rate.

Adobe Flash does support H.264 but you cannot view those videos from a browser or device that does not have Flash installed.

Available Soon: the Verizon iPhone

Monday, March 29th, 2010

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that Apple may be preparing a new iPhone that works on Verizon’s wireless network. This long-anticipated move means that consumers can now have the best of both worlds: the iPhone’s slick user interface and Verizon’s extensive wireless network. This new iPhone will incorporate CDMA technology which is the standard that Verizon has been using for years.

I’m sure there are many consumers like myself who have used Verizon for years and love to taunt our AT&T-using friends who are beleaguered by incessant dropped calls and poor voice quality. For Verizon loyalists, the iPhone has always been a bridge too far because we are simply unwilling to ditch a high quality for a poor quality one. This should turn out to be a big boost for Apple in its quest for global domination of the wireless handheld device market.

Smartphone Market Share

Monday, March 15th, 2010

Comscore has the latest SmartPhone market share numbers:

RIM (Blackberry) 43.0%
Apple 25.1%
Microsoft 15.7%
Google 7.1%
Palm 5.7%

Google shows the biggest gain over the previous quarter with a 4.3% increase while Microsoft lost 4%. So the good news all belongs to Google which has made significant headway in the smartphone market with its Android operating system.

Microsoft continues to struggle and is betting the farm on its launch of Windows Mobile 7. One major problem for Microsoft is that Mobile 7 cannot run apps built for older versions of Windows Mobile. This is because Microsoft essentially rewrote the platform from the ground up.

Application availability is one of Apple’s strongest selling points. For fifth-place Palm it is one of their weakest.

Expect Google Android to continue its march forward. The interesting question will be whether they can slow Apple’s momentum among new adopters.

Most Popular Handheld Games

Thursday, February 4th, 2010

Mplayit has an interesting graphic showing the most popular games for the iPhone, Android devices, and Blackberry.  I find it amazing that Tetris, a game invented all the way back in 1984, is #1 for the iPhone arcade games.  In general, I find the whole game genre a bit mystifying.  I played backgammon on line for a while but I uninstalled that after I realized I was wasting too much time on it.  I find it amazing that people have so much time to play so many games.

mplayit

The Winners and Losers of 2010 – Handhelds and Tablets

Wednesday, January 6th, 2010

Yes, I realize that we are already several days into 2010, but thanks to a monster flu I have been out of action for some time now. Today, I’m finally getting a chance to put down my thoughts and predictions about what the year 2010 will bring. So here is the first installment of a series of posts focusing on the forecast for specific market segments in the coming year.

Handhelds

Google Nexus One

Google Nexus One

The worst kept secret in the world from last year was the much-rumored Google phone. The Nexus One has finally arrived and Google is touting it as the greatest thing since, well, the Apple iPhone (Click here for a very cool Nexus One demo). Why Google has chosen to move away from its long-held practice of avoiding hardware development has a lot of us wondering. I’m sure it has Google’s partners who have developed Android-based phones (like Motorola) wondering as well. Why should they continue to pour money and resources into their Android phones if their software supplier (Google) is now going to be a direct competitor? Consider how many device manufacturers would jump at the chance to build phones running iPhone OS and competing directly with the iPhone itself? Not too many I suspect.

Ultimately, I suspect the Nexus One will do little to alter Apple’s growing dominance in handheld devices. It’s too little, too late, and there are way more iPhone apps than Android apps out there. In addition, Apple still holds the edge in sex appeal.

2010 will hopefully be the year when Verizon subscribers can (finally) choose an iPhone.  This will depend on whether Verizon and Apple can come to terms and introduce a CDMA-equipped iPhone that works on Verizon’s network. This would be a big development for many of us (like myself) who would like to have an iPhone but are put off by AT&T’s spotty coverage. I mean, this is 2010 for goodness sake. Isn’t it embarrassing for AT&T that “Are you there?” is the most common phrase that is transmitted (or dropped) across their network?

For all of the other mobile phone manufacturers the competitive landscape has just become much more difficult. Companies like Nokia, Samsung and Motorola will struggle to differentiate themselves in a market segment increasingly dominated by Apple and Google. This could also be the year that Palm finally goes under overwhelmed by the Apple wave.

Winners: Apple, Verizon

Losers: Google, Nokia, Motorola, Palm, AT&T

Tablets

So-called “tablet” computing devices are likely to be a major new growth segment in 2010. These devices are shaped like a slate and typically include touchscreen interfaces and may or may not include a stylus or other writing device. Tablets are intended to be simpler and easier to use than full-featured notebook computers. In my opinion, there is a serious market need for a device with a bigger screen and more functionality than a handheld that is also less expensive and easier to manage than a notebook computer. Some are saying 2010 will be the “year of the tablet”. I think they could be onto something.

Given that, the company to watch in this segment is, of course, Apple. Rumors have been flying that Apple will soon announce a tablet computing device dubbed the iSlate. This will be a multi-media touch-screen device with e-reader functionality. Reportedly, iPhone apps can be adapted to run on the iSlate without too much effort. This is critical because it means that the iSlate will have a wide array of applications available right out of the gate.

Microsoft Courier

Microsoft Courier

Microsoft is also expected to soon announce Microsoft Courier.  This is a booklet device with two screens that allows you to draw and write with a stylus or your fingers. While Microsoft was an early pioneer in tablet computing they have never been able to turn it into a big money-maker. My opinion is that Courier will be too cumbersome to be useful and I have never been a big fan of pen computing. Computers should free us from the use of pens and paper, not duplicate them. I will concede that there are some applications where a drawing device is essential; it just isn’t required for the large majority of us.

Not to be outdone by its rivals, Google is also rumored to be putting the final touches on a tablet device. This device will run Google’s Chrome OS which I discussed here and here. The Google tablet would (of course) have touchscreen capabilities, e-reader software and should do a bang-up job with multimedia presentation. Chrome OS will also be easy for consumers to manage since it’s going to keep all of your data and applications in the cloud (where they belong) rather than keep them on your local device. This operating system will also be crucial to the success of the upcoming Google netbook.

One of the most surprising success stories of the last few years has been the explosive popularity of Amazon’s e-reader device, the Kindle. Amazon rapidly gobbled up this market segment while everyone else was sleeping. With Apple and Google now pushing their way into this space it’s likely going to get a lot more difficult for Amazon to maintain its dominance. Book and magazine reading is rapidly going to become an expected feature in tablet computers. The question then becomes whether Amazon will transform the Kindle into a full-fledged tablet computing device in order to keep pace. That undoubtedly will not be easy.

Winners: Apple, Google

Losers: Microsoft, Amazon

Has the Google Phone finally arrived?

Tuesday, December 15th, 2009
Google Phone

HTC phone with Android

Rumor has it that Google employees are currently testing an all-Google cell phone that will be rolled out soon. Apparently, this device will be made available to the public without a contract that binds the user to a specific service carrier like AT&T or Verizon.

This would represent a big change in the way things are done here in the US, but is more like how things work in Europe. Currently, if you want a specific brand of cellphone (iPhone for example) you may not be able to use it with your current carrier. The way most people purchase cell phones is by signing up for a multi-year contract with a carrier who then subsidizes the purchase of the cell phone itself for you by knocking a few hundred dollars off of the factory price. A Google phone that is released to the general public would upend that model.

It would also put the Apple iPhone squarely into Google’s crosshairs. Unlike most cell phones, the iPhone is a seamless combination of hardware and software designed by the same company. A Google phone would be similar in this respect. The benefits for the consumer is generally a better all-around user experience.

People who make cell phone hardware however may not be too happy since Google will be cutting them out of a piece of the action. Will they still be as eager to build cell phones that run Google’s Android operating system? Maybe not.

The carriers may not be too thrilled either since they rely on their handset offerings to differentiate themselves from one another. If all handsets eventually work with every carrier then they will have to compete solely in other areas like quality of service and coverage.

A Google phone, like Chrome OS,  fits nicely into their overall strategy for world domination. Google wants to remove the barriers (i.e., Microsoft and Apple software and hardware) between you and their online services. What better way to do that than by giving you a Google phone to go with your Google netbook. Can a Google desktop be too far behind? Undoubtedly. You heard it here first.