Posts Tagged ‘IPhone’

iPhones on Verizon at Long Last

Wednesday, June 30th, 2010

According to Bloomberg, our long wait for the iPhone on Verizon’s wireless network may be over next January. I have been anticipating this for some time since I am a dedicated Verizon loyalist and absolutely refuse to switch to AT&T (I’ve seen my wife pulling her hair out with AT&T long enough while I have enjoyed nearly flawless service with Verizon).

The question now becomes whether I should opt for an Android phone now or wait another six months for the iPhone. Apple’s blocking of Flash applications and it’s restrictive licensing terms that prevent developers from using cross compilers are both bad news for the mobile phone consumer. These actions undoubtedly restrict the quality and depth of the user experience. Placing manacles on Apple developers by forcing them to write in Objective C, C, C++, or JavaScript flies in the face of common sense and can only hobble future development for the platform.

The other issue for me is the high cost of data plans with Verizon. $30 a month adds up to $360 a year for a capability that I honestly wouldn’t use that often. For 95% of my waking hours I am not more than ten feet away from a fully featured desktop or laptop computer (at home, the laptop is on the dinner table and we have two desktops upstairs).  Why would I choose to check my email with a small handheld that has a dinky screen and no keyboard as opposed to a desktop or laptop computer?  Obviously, I wouldn’t.

For the remaining 5% of time I’m either driving or engaging in some sort of social activity where it would be rude to become fully absorbed in playing games on my handheld. Of course, I’m not a member of the Facebook-generation where being online 100% of the time is one of life’s essentials.

So we will see. Maybe Verizon will wise up and offer folks like me a cheaper data plan at some point.

Available Soon: the Verizon iPhone

Monday, March 29th, 2010

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that Apple may be preparing a new iPhone that works on Verizon’s wireless network. This long-anticipated move means that consumers can now have the best of both worlds: the iPhone’s slick user interface and Verizon’s extensive wireless network. This new iPhone will incorporate CDMA technology which is the standard that Verizon has been using for years.

I’m sure there are many consumers like myself who have used Verizon for years and love to taunt our AT&T-using friends who are beleaguered by incessant dropped calls and poor voice quality. For Verizon loyalists, the iPhone has always been a bridge too far because we are simply unwilling to ditch a high quality for a poor quality one. This should turn out to be a big boost for Apple in its quest for global domination of the wireless handheld device market.

The Winners and Losers of 2010 – Handhelds and Tablets

Wednesday, January 6th, 2010

Yes, I realize that we are already several days into 2010, but thanks to a monster flu I have been out of action for some time now. Today, I’m finally getting a chance to put down my thoughts and predictions about what the year 2010 will bring. So here is the first installment of a series of posts focusing on the forecast for specific market segments in the coming year.

Handhelds

Google Nexus One

Google Nexus One

The worst kept secret in the world from last year was the much-rumored Google phone. The Nexus One has finally arrived and Google is touting it as the greatest thing since, well, the Apple iPhone (Click here for a very cool Nexus One demo). Why Google has chosen to move away from its long-held practice of avoiding hardware development has a lot of us wondering. I’m sure it has Google’s partners who have developed Android-based phones (like Motorola) wondering as well. Why should they continue to pour money and resources into their Android phones if their software supplier (Google) is now going to be a direct competitor? Consider how many device manufacturers would jump at the chance to build phones running iPhone OS and competing directly with the iPhone itself? Not too many I suspect.

Ultimately, I suspect the Nexus One will do little to alter Apple’s growing dominance in handheld devices. It’s too little, too late, and there are way more iPhone apps than Android apps out there. In addition, Apple still holds the edge in sex appeal.

2010 will hopefully be the year when Verizon subscribers can (finally) choose an iPhone.  This will depend on whether Verizon and Apple can come to terms and introduce a CDMA-equipped iPhone that works on Verizon’s network. This would be a big development for many of us (like myself) who would like to have an iPhone but are put off by AT&T’s spotty coverage. I mean, this is 2010 for goodness sake. Isn’t it embarrassing for AT&T that “Are you there?” is the most common phrase that is transmitted (or dropped) across their network?

For all of the other mobile phone manufacturers the competitive landscape has just become much more difficult. Companies like Nokia, Samsung and Motorola will struggle to differentiate themselves in a market segment increasingly dominated by Apple and Google. This could also be the year that Palm finally goes under overwhelmed by the Apple wave.

Winners: Apple, Verizon

Losers: Google, Nokia, Motorola, Palm, AT&T

Tablets

So-called “tablet” computing devices are likely to be a major new growth segment in 2010. These devices are shaped like a slate and typically include touchscreen interfaces and may or may not include a stylus or other writing device. Tablets are intended to be simpler and easier to use than full-featured notebook computers. In my opinion, there is a serious market need for a device with a bigger screen and more functionality than a handheld that is also less expensive and easier to manage than a notebook computer. Some are saying 2010 will be the “year of the tablet”. I think they could be onto something.

Given that, the company to watch in this segment is, of course, Apple. Rumors have been flying that Apple will soon announce a tablet computing device dubbed the iSlate. This will be a multi-media touch-screen device with e-reader functionality. Reportedly, iPhone apps can be adapted to run on the iSlate without too much effort. This is critical because it means that the iSlate will have a wide array of applications available right out of the gate.

Microsoft Courier

Microsoft Courier

Microsoft is also expected to soon announce Microsoft Courier.  This is a booklet device with two screens that allows you to draw and write with a stylus or your fingers. While Microsoft was an early pioneer in tablet computing they have never been able to turn it into a big money-maker. My opinion is that Courier will be too cumbersome to be useful and I have never been a big fan of pen computing. Computers should free us from the use of pens and paper, not duplicate them. I will concede that there are some applications where a drawing device is essential; it just isn’t required for the large majority of us.

Not to be outdone by its rivals, Google is also rumored to be putting the final touches on a tablet device. This device will run Google’s Chrome OS which I discussed here and here. The Google tablet would (of course) have touchscreen capabilities, e-reader software and should do a bang-up job with multimedia presentation. Chrome OS will also be easy for consumers to manage since it’s going to keep all of your data and applications in the cloud (where they belong) rather than keep them on your local device. This operating system will also be crucial to the success of the upcoming Google netbook.

One of the most surprising success stories of the last few years has been the explosive popularity of Amazon’s e-reader device, the Kindle. Amazon rapidly gobbled up this market segment while everyone else was sleeping. With Apple and Google now pushing their way into this space it’s likely going to get a lot more difficult for Amazon to maintain its dominance. Book and magazine reading is rapidly going to become an expected feature in tablet computers. The question then becomes whether Amazon will transform the Kindle into a full-fledged tablet computing device in order to keep pace. That undoubtedly will not be easy.

Winners: Apple, Google

Losers: Microsoft, Amazon

The Mobile Operating System Wars

Thursday, April 16th, 2009

One of the more interesting technology battlegrounds right now is the one for control of the operating system platform for handheld devices. There are four main players in this fight that you should keep track of.

ip1

Everyone knows about the Apple IPhone and its cool interface (shown above) that is driven by their operating system known as the iPhone OS. The IPhone has broken new ground in the handheld universe by combining a sleek design with an intuitive user interface that excels at consuming media such as video, audio, and photos and excels at web browser. In addition, the IPhone gives you access to thousands of applications that can do just about anything you can imagine.  There’s even an IPhone application that can help you count cards in Blackjack.

berry

Research in Motion’s ever popular Blackberry (pictured above) is credited by many with launching a new wave of innovation in the handheld space. The Blackberry’s strength is with business users and its killer app is one we all use: email. While the Blackberry was a ground-breaker with its easy to use keyboard and email applications, its screen technology, browser and form factor don’t compare well with the IPhone.

The third major player in this arena is Nokia which promotes its Symbian open operating system for mobile phones. The new Nokia E71 is trying to take on both the IPhone and the Blackberry in their respective areas of strength. Nokia says it will eventually come out with a touch-screen phone as well.

The newest entrant to this content is Google and its Android operating system which hasn’t received as much attention as the others because it is still in its early stages. To date, only a single handset manufacturer is using Android in a currently shipping product, but this is surely going to change in the near future. 

Android is based on Linux and allows developers to write applications in Java using Java libraries supplied by Google which has open-sourced most of their code. Google’s strategic objective with Android has been to promote a handheld platform that can run Google applications and expand their user base. Many Google applications like Google Maps are particularly useful for mobile users. This is a shot of the emulator that comes with the Android SDK.

and

In November of 2007, Google handed Android over to the Open Handset Alliance that includes heavyweights like Motorola, Sony Ericsson, Qualcomm and Vodafone. Notably absent in the ranks are Apple, Nokia, Microsoft and Apple’s partner AT&T. Google’s goal is to promote Android as an open platform and bring in as many big players as they can as a counterweight to the proprietary platforms that Apple and Research in Motion are pushing for their handheld devices.

This contest for supremacy of the mobile software platform will take a while to play out but is sure will be interesting to follow.

Skype on your IPhone

Tuesday, March 31st, 2009

CNET reports that Skype is set to release a version of its internet phone software that will run on the Apple IPhone. Customers will be able to call other Skype users for free and pay a small fee to call landlines. The IPhone Skype only works over WiFi and will not use a 3G network. CNET has a slideshow of Skype on the IPhone.

skype_logoIt seemed inevitable that VOIP would make its way onto digital handsets like the IPhone. AT&T has protected itself from competition like Skype by prohibiting the use of VOIP applications on the cellular network that the IPhone uses. The carriers have a vested interest in safeguarding the revenue they get when users exceed their calling plan minutes or by racking up roaming fees. Services like Skype are a direct threat to that revenue stream so it’s obvious why they want them excluded from their cellular networks.

Convergence in the telecommunications industry will continue to force the players to change with the times however. You have to wonder if one day carriers like AT&T will drop all of their voice services and simply provide data over their networks. When you think about it, voice is just another type of data and it doesn’t make sense that people should have to pay special fees for it. Applications like Skype are proof of that.